Phly, every time you post a video I add an attempt ( # 93 ). We need a type 87 video! I’ve been at this for months… Also, if you can help reduce both the cost and RP for the type 16 (look at 9.0 cent) that would be awesome.
If you look at protection analysis you can see the 100mm upper glacis and the 50mm turret neck combine to be 150mm near the interface. This is how they have broken the game at the moment with volumetric shells as the shell interacts with both plates and gaijin is adding them together.
Same if you look at the turret side in armour view. Where the centrally modelled plate interfaces with the one nearer the front (or back), where they join , protection analysis shows combined armour thickness (for like a few pixels). I think this is what is leading to trolly armour.
And if you look at the intersection of those two plates and the turret mounted track armour, you can get over 170mm of protection which should be around 70mm
dude have u never play the t72? i cant find a vid of you playing it. sm1 link me or this guy has to play it, im up to the t55, and holy shit am i destroying with it
The ballistic cap, was a long and pointed cap fitted to a projectile to reduce air resistance in flight. So actually increasing penetration at medium and long ranges, because of the reduce deceleration by air resistance and consequent higher striking velocity. Plus some people believed that the cap ‘gripped’ the metal surface and was less like to deflect.
capped shells are horrible at angles balistic capped are strong against angles capped balisting capped are like capped but better over distance, that’s why T-34-85 with the APHEBC can kinda pen the panther at 0 meters away while the panther with with APCBC with 198mm of pen (dont remember exacly) has more trouble than the T 34
better explenations is the T44 with the same shell as the T 34 but has a APCBC with 164 ish of pen and cant go thoght the panther while the T34 has more chances
Phly, every time you post a video I add an attempt ( # 93 ). We need a type 87 video! I’ve been at this for months… Also, if you can help reduce both the cost and RP for the type 16 (look at 9.0 cent) that would be awesome.
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAH
145 GJN everyone, why even bother making this video.
PHOur.0
War Thunder physics at their A game
MD-8 fuze shell is not that good for KV. I’ve done all my work with the higher velocity stock MD-5 fuze👉😼
Phour point oh?
I want this tank badly
Sherman’s side armor is a joke, angling usually just makes it a coin flip
Suomi mainittu! Tiedätte missä tavataan!
ph
Day 1 of making phly play cancer machine stug 42
I love how Phly’s username converts to the forbidden letter F
Ph
Finish more like Chinese copy
If you look at protection analysis you can see the 100mm upper glacis and the 50mm turret neck combine to be 150mm near the interface. This is how they have broken the game at the moment with volumetric shells as the shell interacts with both plates and gaijin is adding them together.
Should’ve said these values are the flat equivalent protection on the T34 ’42
Same if you look at the turret side in armour view. Where the centrally modelled plate interfaces with the one nearer the front (or back), where they join , protection analysis shows combined armour thickness (for like a few pixels). I think this is what is leading to trolly armour.
And if you look at the intersection of those two plates and the turret mounted track armour, you can get over 170mm of protection which should be around 70mm
I have a question what is the best way to get silver lions
This tank had caused me pain and agony
The KV-1B is what the Banished from halo would make
dude have u never play the t72? i cant find a vid of you playing it. sm1 link me or this guy has to play it, im up to the t55, and holy shit am i destroying with it
ph
The ballistic cap, was a long and pointed cap fitted to a projectile to reduce air resistance in flight. So actually increasing penetration at medium and long ranges, because of the reduce deceleration by air resistance and consequent higher striking velocity. Plus some people believed that the cap ‘gripped’ the metal surface and was less like to deflect.
“Can we put some PH’s in the comments”
OK:
Battery acid: 1
Stomach acid: 2-3
Milk: 6.7
Baking soda: 9
Ammonia: 11
Bleach: 12.5-13
that intro was so great 😀
I’m not sure what’s worse, this at 4.0 or the KV-1C at 4.7. It’s nuts that Germany gets two of the best KV variants in the game
With T-34-57 moved to 4.7 this thing is unstoppable
Driver’s Hatch should do it while using the M10 or T34-57
Phour point zero
That’s a UK plug not stonk Soviet Stalinium Bias Machine
Gotta bounce ’em all!
b for bias
worst game i’ve seen from phly. Lazy waste of time on lazy potato shots.
ph
I love how the thumbnail tricked me
Phour point O
This is PHour.0
The 2nd map he played on thats the map where all The mw 2 bush campers go
2nd attempt
Drive out in leopard A1A1 with apfsds
I was baited Phly! I wanted three guns!
Phour.0
So close to 1m
for the people that dont know
capped shells are horrible at angles
balistic capped are strong against angles
capped balisting capped are like capped but better over distance, that’s why T-34-85 with the APHEBC can kinda pen the panther at 0 meters away while the panther with with APCBC with 198mm of pen (dont remember exacly) has more trouble than the T 34
better explenations is the T44 with the same shell as the T 34 but has a APCBC with 164 ish of pen and cant go thoght the panther while the T34 has more chances
APCBC is supposed to be the best type of shell but not really, its APBC
I
Will
Make
Comment
Hey phly could you please take out the pt-76 with APCR only? Attempt #3
Phinland or Phunland 🙂
COME ONE ALMOST 1M YOU CAN DO IT
u are like general in napoleon’s wars, just sitting on hill and watch on the battlefield.