The soviets used the wood on the tanks for when the got stuck in mud or Skeg. You would chain the wood to the tracks to act as a giant paddle. There are vids showing this.
Phly you don’t like playing more than 6.3 BR because at 6.7 starts the freaking HEATFS crap.. Armor meta stops at 6.3. I wish they never added the leopard 1 and it’s 400mm HEATFS versing 2nd WW tanks…
The angled engine deck of an is series is actually far more resilient than you would think. It will stop a Panther’s round and can even give a long 88 a run for its money.
Can you do a video on the T10M? It look like an is-3 on steroids, is really funny to play and is also a really good tank. I personally play it just with the APHE an some HE.
If its stupid and it works its not stupid. but I believe most of the time it’s there to unbog the tank. hook a chains to the logs hook chains to the tracks move forward unhook log at back of tank rinse and repeat please see starting statement
The maneuverableity comes from the torque of the diesel engines used in all of the russian tanks. They just needed fewer gears, as as an example their german gasoline powered counterparts.
To the end of the 2nd World war the Finns and Germans mounted wood on to the sides of their StUGs, they thought it wold give them extra protection. But the reports should that it wasn’t as effektiv as they hoped, in reality the reports of the Finnish military showed that the Wood does is adding weight, gives a bit of protection but many is used to free the tank from snow and mud. Their is a last thing to mention there are rumors that the Transmission heavily suffers from the added weight to the Tank.
I remeber reading somewhere, that the loga where used as an help with mud etc. But also to put under the tanks rear for getting more depression in Hilly terrain.
Day 170: Phly, you should play the Hampden TB Mk I. High-yield, low-tier bomber goodness
Agree, I rarely play above 6.3-6.7, depending on nation. Precipitous fall off in fun after that. Peak fun is around 4.0 IMHO.
Philippine army used wooden armor as well to combat insurgent rockets
Hey phly could you show your keybinds and settings please
The soviets used the wood on the tanks for when the got stuck in mud or Skeg. You would chain the wood to the tracks to act as a giant paddle. There are vids showing this.
Phly you don’t like playing more than 6.3 BR because at 6.7 starts the freaking HEATFS crap..
Armor meta stops at 6.3.
I wish they never added the leopard 1 and it’s 400mm HEATFS versing 2nd WW tanks…
The angled engine deck of an is series is actually far more resilient than you would think. It will stop a Panther’s round and can even give a long 88 a run for its money.
when russia tanks combine with logs as a powerful strategy
The reason why the Soviets changed to wood because Human Space armor doesn’t protect the tank to chemical rounds
How do I get this tank
IS-2 Oak vs Object 268 Pine
17:20 Kool Aid Man! OH YEAH!
Can you do a video on the T10M? It look like an is-3 on steroids, is really funny to play and is also a really good tank. I personally play it just with the APHE an some HE.
Her Phly how do you unlock that all and soooo many golden eagle and silver lion??
Oldschool tanks where it’s a slugfest. Yeeeee. MBTs? More like MB-tease. Never any good brawling action.
Yes, the wood also acts as a spoiler on the Obj. 268, it’ll win in the next F1 GP
If its stupid and it works its not stupid. but I believe most of the time it’s there to unbog the tank. hook a chains to the logs hook chains to the tracks move forward unhook log at back of tank rinse and repeat please see starting statement
War Thunder ground rb summed up – bonks riding a 1/6 scale sherman while Steve presses w and clicks the button to shoot
I love how when u shoot the shot intimately obliterated the crew before even pening
Just to answer the question
Monaco GP was yesterday
My brain seriously cannot understand how two wooden logs have almost the same thickness as the tigers front plate
Nah they don’t, wood is something like 5% of the same protection as steel per MM in WT
Reactive wood armor when
The maneuverableity comes from the torque of the diesel engines used in all of the russian tanks. They just needed fewer gears, as as an example their german gasoline powered counterparts.
I think the logs saved me once from a heat FS round once.
butter bean salad
As long as this IS-2 pice of shit do continue to fire at long range, it’s still pure science fictionnal arcade tank
To the end of the 2nd World war the Finns and Germans mounted wood on to the sides of their StUGs, they thought it wold give them extra protection. But the reports should that it wasn’t as effektiv as they hoped, in reality the reports of the Finnish military showed that the Wood does is adding weight, gives a bit of protection but many is used to free the tank from snow and mud. Their is a last thing to mention there are rumors that the Transmission heavily suffers from the added weight to the Tank.
wtf is butter bean salad?
Maybe it depends on the type of wood ahahha
RIP SIDHU MOOSE WALA
16 reverse speed
I remeber reading somewhere, that the loga where used as an help with mud etc. But also to put under the tanks rear for getting more depression in Hilly terrain.
It’s the density of the wood.. Hard wood or soft, Oak vs. Pine..
Comming in hot with the next update: super-op cope cages! xD
boy the worst part is wood actually helps in terms of protection at the time
try out the new m1a1 AIM in dev server its pretty fun
IS-2 has diesel engine so you would think that it has alot of torq
If a tank with the same horsepower and weight was from a different nation it would be much much slower than the Is-2… IS-2 fast b/c Russian bias
Do they have 2x4s as cosmetics ? Slap those on an RT-20 or an AUBL and recreate the Battle Of Marawi
Ussr had the best 6.3 lineup with the T44 before the nerf plus the is2 and the su100p
but the gepard at 8.0 🙁
and i love the RU 251 at 7.0 so 🙁
That wood do it