WT Ground forces first impressions

9,661 views
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (403 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...

Source: TheFochYou

Interested in playing War Thunder?
http://warthunder.com/en/registration?r=userinvite_6324705
System specs: FX 8350, GTX 760,
Want help the channel?

40 Comments:

  1. ladies and mentlegen 😛

  2. Agree with all the points you made my good sir:)

  3. foch playing wt :O

  4. The best review on WTGF so far … and I have seen few. The first time I can see the tanks properly, other videos were too dark. Great work.

  5. Wot has more tanks than war thunder
    So if you want experience with differently variety of tanks ,wot will be a better choice

    • Map awareness ? It’s either camp at the same location all the time or use fast tanks to move unpredictability but RNG would still destroy you in one shot especially the ones from tier 8 to 10. This just promotes camping in WOT, I expect only bad players support arty because it is luck base which suit those bad players.

    • There will be over 60 vehicles including premium tanks just in the Russian tank tree…

  6. Try not to play like WOT so much.

  7. they said the spotting system is place-holder from the planes, but as u said its beta

  8. Grinding for the Tiger 1 is hard and long but worth it in the end.

  9. mods used: xvm fail! 😀

  10. Alexander Yordanov

    On leading targets:
    You do that in WoT too 😛

    BTW Foch, what do you think on made up Tiger 2 vs IS-4M

  11. In WoT arty doesn’t stop retards from camping, since they usually don’t know in what kind of trouble they are.

    Also: the biggest problem with WT tanks are that planes and tanks in the same map don’t go together, planes have a huge map, and 1-5% of that are player controlled tanks and planes just destroy tanks without effort.

  12. WT GF hm…
    so far i have played is pretty good they are issue but it says Closed Beta Test for that
    map’s are which is nice
    there 3 game modes with variants of battles
    the best of them so far is conquest where having the cap or not doesnt really matter cause the points go down slowly and allows you to have fun and kill other tanks
    Agreed on aiming stuff
    you dont aim at certain parts no criticals and stuff which is logical
    overall Possitive addition to the games with tanks and defently spoils the monopolio that WG had untill now in that derpartment

  13. This is why i subbed, you are very honest and you can figure out things that many people don’t. Same goes with wot.

  14. ILikeTheThingsIDo

    You haven’t played tanks yet. I can tell you that past tier 2, the Russians have very little superiority beyond mobility and occasionally armor. The IS-1 is a match for the Tiger, having a slightly worse gun for better mobility and armor. The T-34-85 is by no means a match for the Panther. It is faster and that’s all. The armor is cheese to even Panzer IVs and even the higher tier Panzer III’s

    Also, pay to win is incorrect. Having a higher tier machine doesn’t make you a better player. It is definitely pay to advance. All free to play games are inherently like that. They degree which is acceptable varies according to the person.

  15. ILikeTheThingsIDo

    The nice thing is that there will hopefully be less power creep in WT. Seriously, does anyone want to take an IS-7 up against a WTF E-100? Does anyone want to take a Pershing against a Centurion 1?

  16. I really liked this video and hope you do bring more WT videos 😀

  17. The Russians did actually use ramming as a legitimate tactic in WW2 battle of Kursk. However, it wasnt like you say, instead the T34-85s rammed them so that they mounted them and prevented them turning their turrets and firing.

  18. nuclearsharkattack

    Foch — great to see you starting reviews on the Ground Forces. I bought a tank pack and got into closed beta on the nightly server awhile back. I started playing War Thunder planes over a year ago. They have a fun game which can co-exist with WoT, I don’t think either will impact the other a whole lot, to be honest. The gameplay is just too different with pros/cons for each. I hope you check into the tankplay in Armored Warfare when it hits open beta. AF is modern tanks from 1955-2020 and it looks to be a killer game.

  19. Well foch. Try playing sim battles. Waited 40 minutes to get into one yesterday in my P-51.

  20. I still think they should remove Respawn completely from RB and SB.

  21. TheFunkyChicken

    Good review: some reviews can be too gushing about a new shiny thing while others can over-fixate on one thing about WTGF: nice balance.

  22. +erik260196 in WT free RP arrive by the thousands. In a plane that gets 60% awards I’m getting over 1500 RP on a decent match. In WoT if you wanna get 1500xp you’ll pretty much have to kill the whole enemy team.
    You must have been forgetting about the true wallet warriors. That’s where “Pay to win” comes into play.

    400 Euros is very expensive, that’s why I said ” Grinds are terrible”.

    Gameplay is messed up badly in planes. You get TEN TIMES the matchmaking spread than in 1.35, which is 1.33 compared to a calculated 0.3. 3 minute games, B-17 squads, Yer dive bombers.

    Oh the fighters in Arcade? They’re just for looks. No winning involved.

    Tanks are a bit easier to balance, model and code. I hope they do a better job.

  23. wot is a acarde noob game 🙂

  24. i will be waiting for this game to come in Open Beta

  25. Guys. Tomorow!, 15th of may. TANKS ARE GONNA BE ON THE LIBE SERVER.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *